Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hold two referendums to defeat Scottish independence, John Major urges Boris Johnson

First poll would be on principle of independence - with second ‘yes’ vote on outcome of negotiations required before Union is broken up

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 10 November 2020 01:45 EST
Comments
Boris Johnson under fire for claiming UK ‘has a system of mass testing’ when trial yet to start

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

John Major is urging Boris Johnson to hold two Scottish independence referendums, as the best way to keep the United Kingdom together.

Refusing to sanction a fresh poll – even if the SNP triumphs in Holyrood elections next year – is likely to “help the separatist case” by fuelling anger, the former prime minister warned.

Instead, he called for two referendums, the first on the principle of independence, but with a second ‘yes’ vote – on the outcome of the negotiations – required for Scotland to leave the Union.

Sir John suggested it was the way to defeat nationalism, saying: “Scottish electors would know what they were voting for, and be able to compare it to what they now have.

“This did not happen with Brexit: had it done so, there may have been no Brexit.”

The recommendation is made in a lecture in which the Tory elder statesman delivered his fiercest attack yet on EU withdrawal – warning it would be “even more brutal than anyone expected”.

Sir John listed the consequences ahead, including higher food prices, more expensive holidays, more costly health insurance, the loss of the pet passport scheme, higher roaming charges, airport delays and the loss of the automatic right to work, live or study in the EU.

“Small irritations, some may say, but – collectively – a significant loss of freedom that will be an unwelcome surprise to many as Europe itself begins to ‘take back control’,” he told leading lawyers at the Middle Temple society.

Sir John said: “Brexit was sold to our electors on false premises. Promises made will not – indeed, cannot – be kept.

“It defies logic that intelligent men and women making such extravagant promises did not know they were undeliverable – and yet they continued to make them. It was politics. It was campaigning. It was for a cause. It was also unforgiveable.”

And he added: “It now seems that on 1 January next year, Brexit may be even more brutal than anyone expected.”

In Scotland, the ‘yes’ campaign is solidifying its lead as women swing behind independence, wiping out the “gender gap” that had previously shown greater support among men.

Mr Johnson is expected to refuse so-called ‘Indyref2’, even if Nicola Sturgeon’s party triumphs in next May’s elections to the Holyrood parliament and claims a mandate.

But Sir John said: “The Westminster government could agree for an independence referendum to take place, on the basis of two referenda. The first to vote upon the principle of negotiations, and the second upon the outcome of them.”

He added: “Many Scottish voices – and especially business – may support the logic of this: it may focus minds away from a short-term reflex opposition to a perceived English government, and back to the mutual and long-term virtues of the Union.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in