Science: Willetts wins funding battle with warning of 'brain drain'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British scientists gave a collective sigh of relief yesterday at the Government's decision to keep the £4.6bn science budget at the current level for the next four years, meaning that the sector has escaped with a relatively small 9 per cent cut in real terms until 2015.
It is widely seen as a victory for David Willetts, the science minister, who persuaded the Treasury of the importance of maintaining the science base in order to provide the technological breakthroughs and expertise that could help to revive long-term economic growth and employment.
Scientists had given warning that the rumoured cuts of 20 per cent to the science budget would mean "game over" for science in Britain. But yesterday, Mr Willetts insisted: "This is a fantastic deal for the science community... We have ring-fenced the commitment to science spending of £4.6bn per year." Efficiency savings of more than £300m could be found within scientific organisations to offset the real-terms cut in funding, he added.
Some £2.75bn of the budget will be divided between the six research councils. The biggest winner will likely be the Medical Research Council, given the immediacy of its research to NHS patients. But smaller research programmes in the physical sciences are likely to be squeezed hardest, given the Government's commitment to projects such as the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (Cern) in Geneva.
Lord Rees, the Royal Society's president, said the settlement for the core science budget was welcome "The Government has recognised the importance of sustaining the international standing of UK science in a context where other nations are forging ahead," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments