Now Rishi Sunak ‘considers crackdown on 20mph speed limits’
The move comes as PM brands Labour’s position as ‘anti-motorist’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rishi Sunak’s government is said to be considering a crackdown on councils imposing 20mph speed limits in the PM’s latest bid to prove he is “on the side” of motorists.
The push against what he has dubbed “anti-motorist” policies could limit local authorities’ powers to create lower speed limit zones and other measures, such as bus gates, The Guardian reports.
It comes after Mr Sunak ordered a review of low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) amid rising Tory concern that policies aimed at curbing the use of cars could cost them votes at next year’s general election.
The renewed pitch to win over motorists comes after the Conservatives’ narrow victory in the Uxbridge and Ruislip by-election earlier this month, which saw the Tory candidate win over voters concerned about the expansion of Sadiq Khan’s London’s ultra-low emissions zone (Ulez).
That success has further prompted right-wing Tory MPs to urge the prime minister to rethink the party’s net zero pledges, in the hope of attacking Labour’s green pledges.
Rishi Sunak slammed for ‘helicopter lifestyle’ as he claims to be ‘on the side’ of drivers
As Labour and the Conservatives fight over net zero, what are they actually planning?
Man in debt after driving motorhome through London’s low emission zone
How the Ulez scheme in London has tested party politics over pollution
The spread of LTNs in recent months has emerged as a concern among some on the right of the Conservative Party, with Tory MP Nick Fletcher suggesting in the Commons that they were part of an “international socialist concept” that would take away personal liberties.
While Mr Sunak has ordered the review into LTNs, No 10 told The Guardian the prime minister had no plans to act on 20mph limits. The Department for Transport (DfT) said it could not comment.
It comes as the PM labelled Labour “anti-motorist” in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, while insisting he was on the side of drivers.
Mr Sunak told the Telegraph: “The vast majority of people in the country use their cars to get around and are dependent on their cars. When I’m lucky enough to get home to North Yorkshire it’s more representative of how most of the country is living, where cars are important.
“I just want to make sure people know that I’m on their side in supporting them to use their cars to do all the things that matter to them.”
The PM added: “I’ve become slightly more alarmed by the Labour Party’s position. It’s quite anti-motorist”.
But while Tory opposition to Ulez expansion grows, research and polling suggest limiting council powers on LTNs could be a political risk, as they have been popular and effective in reducing speed levels and encouraging walking and cycling.
Councils have powers to impose LTN’s through the 1984 Road Traffic Regulation Act, and a block on them would likely require new legislation.
It is unclear whether the plan would be to seek the removal of all LTNs, including those in place for long periods, or just those installed since 2020, when Boris Johnson’s government gave £200m to fund more.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments