Right to Know Bill likely to clear first hurdle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT is expected to allow a Labour MP's Right to Know Bill to be given a Second Reading - a move its backers believe will be a significant milestone in the battle for freedom of information legislation, writes Nicholas Timmins.
Although the Bill, which would itself provide a full freedom of information Act, remains unlikely to become law, a Second Reading would ensure it went into committee, forcing ministers to defend in detail their opposition to freedom of information laws.
Despite that, William Waldegrave, the Cabinet minister responsible for open government, is understood to be willing to see Mark Fisher's Right to Know Bill gain its Second Reading on 19 February. This is, in part, because Mr Waldegrave's own White Paper on open government will not be ready before then.
Promised 'relatively soon' last July, it has been held up by opposition in Whitehall and among other ministers.
Given the Prime Minister's election commitment to more open Government it is thought to be too embarrassing, when Mr Waldegrave will have no detailed alternative to offer, for the Government to be seen to be killing off a Bill which has Conservative backers.
Mr Waldegrave's stance is in marked contrast to that taken by Baroness Thatcher and Douglas Hurd when Prime Minister and Home Secretary. They unprecedently used not just the ministerial vote but a three-line whip to kill at Second Reading the Private Member's Bill introduced in the last Parliament by Richard Shepherd, a Conservative backer of Mr Fisher's Bill.
Mr Fisher said yesterday he was interested in 'any sign that the Government may be serious about freedom of information legislation', but said he remained anxious that his Bill could still be talked out next month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments