Right of appeal on visas lost in Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT last night beat off a move by an alliance of law lords, bishops and peers of all parties and none to provide would-be visitors to Britain with a chance of an appeal if they are refused a visa, writes Stephen Goodwin.
The Asylum and Immigration Appeals Bill removes a right to appeal for would-be visitors and students who are refused entry visas, saving pounds 1.25m. In an attempt to appear conciliatory, Earl Ferrers, Minister of State at the Home Office, promised that office managers in entry clearance posts overseas would run a daily 'review' of all visa refusals by their officials. But Lord Ackner, a retired Lord of Appeal, dismissed the arrangement as 'a rubber stamp'.
In 1991 there were 917,000 applications for visas, of which 77,000 were refused. Only 1,500 of 9,000 appeals were successful. Lord Ferrers admitted the 1,500 cases represented a problem, but drew gasps when he wondered 'if it is necessary to have this great appeals edifice to get over that'.
Indian-born Baroness Flather, a Conservative and member of the Commission for Racial Equality, said no young male could come to Britain as a visitor from the Indian sub-continent at the moment, and the situation caused great unhappiness.
An amendment moved by Lord Ackner would have introduced a filter under which anyone wishing to appeal would first have had to obtain leave from an adjudicator. It was defeated by 148 votes to 124. The clause removing the right of appeal was agreed by 120 votes to 97.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments