Retreat on BR pension plan fund
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT was forced into a significant retreat on its rail privatisation Bill last night when it abandoned plans to suspend payments to the British Rail pension fund.
The retreat in the face of angry protests by pension fund trustees was underpinned when the Lords also carried a rebel amendment requiring the Government to tighten the protection for BR pensioners.
The retreat came as Commons rebels and ministers continued attempts to reach a compromise over the Government's refusal to allow BR to compete for rail franchises after privatisation.
The Government was defeated yesterday by 152 votes to 123 on an amendment from Lord Peyton, the former Tory transport minister, which would force the Government to get the written agreement of pension trustees before making any significant changes to the pension fund.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments