Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Race equality head backs Straw on wearing of veil

Nigel Morris,Sarah Cassidy
Wednesday 11 October 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain's race watchdog has said Jack Straw was "completely right" to express his concerns about Muslim women wearing veils.

Trevor Phillips, the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, also gave his full support to schools that ban girls from wearing veils in lessons.

And the Government signalled yesterday that it would withhold cash from any Muslim group that fails to tackle extremists in its ranks.

With the row intensifying over Muslim dress, Mr Phillips told MPs he believed that Mr Straw, the Leader of the Commons, had taken a "perfectly reasonable" stance last week. "I think it's right for him to say 'would you mind not making me feel uncomfortable' in this case, as long as it is clearly understood the answer to that can be 'no'."

He added: "Jack Straw was completely right to raise this. It is not a question of public policy, but a question of social etiquette and manners."

Mr Phillips also said he believed the wearing of veils for religious reasons should not override school-uniform policies, providing they have been "arrived at properly".

"If I were the headteacher in a school, I would probably say veils should not be worn in the classroom," he told the Commons Education and Skills Committee.

Bill Rammell, the Higher Education minister, also showed his support yesterday for universities and colleges that ban students and teachers from wearing the veil. "I'm not dictating hard and fast rules, as dress codes are a matter for university authorities. But Imperial College [London] recently banned the face veil and I think that this is arguably the best decision." Ruth Kelly, the Secretary of State for Communities, told moderate Muslims yesterday that they could no longer "sit on the sidelines" in the fight against extremism.

She pledged the Government's support to Muslim groups which took on the arguments of radicals, and indicated there would be a "significant shift" in state funding and engagement in favour of organisations which spoke out clearly against extremism. But she was critical of groups and individuals who chose to boycott commemorations such as Holocaust Memorial Day.

Although she did not name it, the Muslim Council of Britain has not taken part in the event.

Speaking to a Muslim audience in London, Ms Kelly said: "I do not come here to say that tackling extremists is your problem as Muslims alone. This is a shared problem. It is a shared battle for the kind of society we want to be and the values that we all hold dear. But I do say that, without you fully on side, we will fail. Your voice is more powerful than mine. And your actions can be more effective."

Harriet Harman, the Constitutional Affairs minister, delivered the strongest attack by a government member on veils. In an interview with New Statesman magazine, she said: "If you want equality, you have to be in society, not hidden away from it. How can you stand as an MP when men's faces are on posters, and voters can't see yours? The veil is an obstacle to women's participation, on equal terms, in society."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in