Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Questions guide needs 'complete reform'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ministers were accused last night of reneging on a pledge to scrap controversial guidelines telling civil servants to investigate the background and motive of MPs who ask parliamentary questions.

Ministers were accused last night of reneging on a pledge to scrap controversial guidelines telling civil servants to investigate the background and motive of MPs who ask parliamentary questions.

The Government promised to act last month after The Independent revealed the guidelines for answering questions. But despite a review, the guidelines continue to advise civil servants to carry out checks on policies of opposition parties or backbenchers before answering questions. Officials are also told to check whether there has been any media interest in the issue at question. The instruction to investigate whether an MP was "friendly" before answering the question has now been abolished by the Department for Work and Pensions.

The department defended the review, approved by Andrew Smith, the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, saying it "removed the ambiguities."

But the Liberal Democrats said the Government had just tinkered with the guide when it should have been completely reviewed. "All they have done is take a short backward shuffle when it needs complete reform," said Andrew Stunell, the party's chief whip.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in