Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Private companies spending public money should be subject to Freedom of Information law, watchdog says

The new Information Commissioner also says she will crack down on public bodies breaking rules

Jon Stone
Friday 02 September 2016 12:48 EDT
Comments
Many important public services are outsourced to a variety of private companies
Many important public services are outsourced to a variety of private companies (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Private companies delivering public services or in receipt of public money should be public to freedom of information rules, the Government’s new Information Commissioner has said.

Concerned citizens, journalists, and campaigners use powers granted to all residents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain information about the way their services are run and money spent by the Government.

But people looking for transparency from the Government have long been frustrated by an increasing reliance on private sector contracting and outsourcing by public bodies.

Private companies are exempt from the FOIA and when they are involved in delivering public services important information can often only be found on their books.

Even when a public body holds data relevant to the a contract it can often be blocked on the grounds that it is “commercially sensitive” to contractors involved.

However, Elizabeth Denham, who was named as the new Information Commissioner in April this year, said private companies which used significant public money should be open to scrutiny.

“Private contractors above a certain threshold for a contract or doing some specific types of work could be included under the FoI Act,” she told the BBC.

“The Government could do more to include private bodies that are basically doing work on behalf of the public.”

Under the 2010 Coalition government ministers promised to write FOI provisions into future Government contracts, but signs of progress have been slow to emerge.

The Information Commissioner has no power to force private companies to follow FOI; the Government would have to legislate to achieve this aim.

Ms Denham, who was previously the information commissioner in the Canadian province of British Columbia, said she would be tougher on public bodies that broke rules.

“Looking at this from the outside, most of the public would have the view that more than one in 10 not getting a timely response to a request is not a sign of success,” she said.

The Government looked at severely curtailing freedom of information rules earlier this year but ultimately backed down after a campaign by newspapers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in