Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Priti Patel fails to explain what is ‘a noisy protest’ to be banned under tough new laws

Home secretary appears to admit rules not yet decided - despite MPs backing tough legislation

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 24 March 2021 08:14 EDT
Comments
Priti Patel fails to explain what is ‘a noisy protest’ to be banned under new laws

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Priti Patel has failed to explain what is “a noisy protest” set to be banned under new laws, as police warned of “a near-impossible job” in handling demonstrations.

The home secretary was asked twice how the controversial new rule would be enforced – but appeared to admit that had not been decided, despite MPs backing the tough legislation.

She also claimed the public had voted for the crackdown when it elected the Conservatives at the general election and declined to say she was “happy” that protests will be allowed again next week.

In a BBC interview, Ms Patel was asked “how will the police decide when a demonstration becomes too noisy”, but deflected the question.

“The police will make judgments and they’ll have guidance on frameworks around the impact of noise had, not just on one individual but across communities.

Read more:

“And these are important changes that, you know, will be discussed and consulted upon as this bill passes through parliament. The police, of course, are working with us in the development of this particular piece of legislation.”

Amid fresh clashes with the police at a second demonstration in Bristol, Ms Patel – who intervened ahead of the Met’s crackdown on the Sarah Everard vigil – was asked if she was “happy” that protests will return.

The easing of the lockdown will permit demonstrations to take place from next Monday – after the home secretary stripped out the exemption last autumn.

She replied: “Peaceful protest is totally different from obviously what we’ve seen in Bristol.

“We live in a democracy, and obviously we uphold the right to protest, but we are in a pandemic and I would urge everybody to continue to follow the rules and guidelines, and just continue to be incredibly conscientious.”

With just five days until the current protests ban is lifted, Ms Patel was warned that the Police Federation was in the dark about the how rules should be enforced

Its chairman, John Apter, had warned the police are doing “a near-impossible job”, the presenter pointed out, adding: “He’s asking you for clarity, he says the police need clarity on the job that they’re doing.”

Ms Patel suggested guidance would follow, but added of the police: “They are operationally independent on the government in terms of how they bring in the rules and the regulations.

“And of course, every time the guidance changes from government, the public are informed about this.”

The Policing Bill will expand police powers to allow them to stamp out protests that cause “serious unease” and create new penalties for people who cause “serious annoyance”.

Critics see it as mechanism to put the current Covid regulations – which the home secretary used to impose an outright ban on demonstrations – on a permanent footing.”

One ex-police chief has said the public should be “really worried” about the crackdown, accusing the government of putting rights “fundamental to our democracy” at risk.

Peter Fahy said it was wrong to “rush legislation” just because ministers are angry about the demonstrations staged by Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion last summer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in