Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour demands release of Priti Patel bullying report, amid claims of ‘political interference’

Senior civil servant is refusing to exonerate the home secretary as Downing Street is demanding, it is alleged

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Saturday 11 July 2020 08:15 EDT
Comments
Boris Johnson on Priti Patel: 'My instinct is to stick with Prit'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour is demanding immediate publication of the report into allegations of bullying by Priti Patel, amid explosive claims that the inquiry chief is resisting pressure to exonerate her.

The party said Boris Johnson must clear up suggestions that Helen MacNamara, a senior civil servant, is refusing to clear the home secretary of all charges as Downing Street is demanding.

“There are now allegations of deeply inappropriate political interference in the publication of the report, both in terms of content and timing,” said Nick Thomas-Symonds, Labour’s shadow home secretary

“The delay in producing it is totally unacceptable,” he added – arguing it had been held up for four months.

It is six weeks since a leak appeared to suggest that the internal investigation had found no evidence that Ms Patel had mistreated civil servants, in three different departments.

But The Times has reported a stand-off between Ms MacNamara, the Cabinet Office’s head of propriety and ethics, and her political masters.

Her inquiry is understood to have heard evidence to substantiate the bullying claims made by Philip Rutnam, the Home Office permanent secretary, who sensationally quit in February.

The article suggested the inquiry report will never be published, unless the prime minister is able to say the investigation found no conclusive evidence of bullying, an outcome that Ms MacNamara is resisting.

Mr Thomas-Symonds added: “It has been over four months since the government promised a report into whether the home secretary broke the ministerial code.

“Yet again the government is acting in the interests of a Conservative Party elite, rather than the national interest. I’ve written to the minister for the cabinet office calling for the report to be published immediately.”

Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA union representing public service managers, echoed the criticism.

“No decision or timetable for decision + No obligation on PM to publish report + No rights for any alleged victim to challenge report = Ministerial Code not fit for purpose,” he tweeted.

Downing Street declined to comment on the suggestions of political interference, or on the timing of the report’s publication – with the Commons going into its summer recess on 22 July.

Ms Patel faced a “tsunami of allegations” – all of which she denies – that she humiliated civil servants in front of others during her time as international development secretary and gave the impression that “everyone is hopeless”.

While she was the work minister, an official in her private office allegedly tried to kill herself after being bullied and later received a £25,000 payout from the government.

The latest controversy comes after Mr Johnson authorised a near-£250,000 payment to Mark Sedwill, the ousted cabinet secretary – an apparent admission that he had, in effect, been sacked.

Politicians and legal experts said he, like Sir Philip, had probably threatened a damaging tribunal case.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in