Priti Patel under fire over Black Lives Matters comments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Priti Patel has been accused of trying to stoke division after she appeared to criticise sports stars who ‘take the knee’ and attacked last year’s Black Lives Matters protests as “dreadful”.
The home secretary also said she would not personally adopt the symbol of injustice, adding there were “other ways in which people can express their opinions”.
During an interview withLBC Radio, Ms Patel appeared to suggest she did not support protests at all, before clarifying she opposed the BLM demonstrations that swept the country last summer, saying: “Those protests were dreadful.”
Criticising the targeting of statues, Ms Patel added: “Protesting in the way in which people did last summer was not the right way at all.
“We saw statues being brought down,” she said, adding: “Some councils making, quite frankly, a stance around statues and street names. There are other ways in which those discussions can take place.”
And, asked if she “didn’t agree with taking the knee per se, at all”, she said: “No.”
Demonstrations were held across the UK last summer, in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd in the US, and in protest against discrimination in this country.
The vast majority of the events were peaceful, although there were clashes between protesters and police in London. Some statues were also vandalised, including one of Winston Churchill.
Most famously, the statue of 17th century slave trade Edward Colston in Bristol was toppled from its pedestal and pushed it into the city’s harbour.
Clive Lewis, the Labour MP forNorwich South, said: “Priti Patel’s views on this are well known. But surely as a government that talks about bringing people together, a way of bringing people together is to show empathy for the pain that protesters feel about racial injustice.
“It would have been good for the home secretary, whatever she thinks about protests or taking a knee or not, to show some empathy.”
He added: “This government seems intent on stoking division, on both sides of this issue, and they need to stop.
“As the US has recently shown, politicians need to be aware their language can have serious repercussions.”
David Lammy, the shadow justice secretary, tweeted that Black Lives Matter “was one of the only parts of 2020 that gave me hope.
“Young and old, black and white, rich and poor came together across the world to stand up to racism.”
He added that Ms Patel calling the protests “dreadful” showed that the Conservatives had “learned nothing”.
In her interview Ms Patel said: “Last summer was quite a moment with all the protest that we saw taking place.” She added: “We saw policing as well coming under a great deal of pressure from some of the protest. I don’t support protest and I also did not support the protests that were associated...”
Interrupted, she sought to clarify that she was not criticising the right to protest itself, but rather the “dreadful” action taken by BLM marchers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments