Prescott under fire over civil service racism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.By Barrie Clement, Labour Editor
By Barrie Clement, Labour Editor
19 December 1999
The Commission for Racial Equality is investigating John Prescott's department after the Deputy Prime Minister allegedly "washed his hands" of allegations of race discrimination.
Mr Prescott, already in hot water over his handling of the transport portfolio, is now under fire for refusing to intervene over alleged racial prejudice within his department.
White staff at the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions are receiving substantially higher job performance ratings than colleagues from ethnic minorities, according to the department's own statistics. The marks awarded are used to determine pay, and also affect job applications and promotion.
The Deputy Prime Minister has been warned by unions that the system of rating employees could be unlawful and that it would therefore be "unwise" to continue to use it.
Under the marking system five white secretaries in London - 10 per cent of the total of white staff in the grade - were said to be "excellent", giving them a 4.7 per cent pay rise, but not one of the 35 non-white staff was so graded. Eleven white administrative officers in the capital, 6 per cent of the total, achieved "excellence", but not one of the 122 non-white staff at that grade did so. Eleven white executive officers (4 per cent) got an excellent rating and just one from an ethnic minority (2 per cent). There were also substantial disparities in the number of staff being graded "very good".
Employees' representatives say that, despite months of negotiations, the department has insisted on retaining the system. "We sought a meeting with John Prescott, but it was refused," said Geoff Lewtas, a national officer at the civil service union PCS.
"Effectively the Deputy Prime Minister has washed his hands of the problem, allowing his officials to deal with it. The accountability however is at his door," said Mr Lewtas. On Wednesday the union met the CRE, which has agreed to look into the allegations.
An investigation into alleged race discrimination in performance appraisal throughout the civil service is being conducted by the Cabinet Office and the civil service unions. However the report is not due for more than a year.
In a statement the DETR said: "The department reviewed its systems when similar effects were seen last year and the system was considered by independent consultants to be fair." It added that any study of appraisal systems should be conducted across Whitehall.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments