Prescott failed to list 'benefit' of flat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Prescott is awaiting a mild rebuke from the MPs' disciplinary committee today after a complaint that he should have registered his tenancy of a union-owned flat.
The Standards and Privileges Committee is expected to ask the Deputy Prime Minister to list the flat in Clapham, south London, in the Register of Members' Interests.
Mr Prescott has paid rent to the Rail, Maritime and Transport union since 1970, but the Tories estimate that the £220 per month he pays is less than one-fifth of the £1,200 market rate. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Elizabeth Filkin, is believed to have found the flat, now occupied by Mr Prescott's son, is a "benefit in kind".
Mr Prescott's Conservative shadow, Archie Norman, said last night that he was determined to pursue what he saw as a breach of the ministerial code. He said Mr Prescott should not take a benefit from a transport union while he was ultimately responsible for the Government's transport policy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments