Policy on asylum-seekers is ruled illegal by law lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Some adult asylum-seekers were left on the streets or dependent on charity hand-outs after being refused state benefits because they applied for asylum too late.
The hardline policy was implemented by Mr Clarke's predecessor, David Blunkett, to deter bogus claims. Under Section 55 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act of 2002, applicants could be denied state help with food and shelter if they did not claim asylum as soon as possible after their arrival in the UK.
Protesters, led by the housing charity Shelter, denounced the policy as inhumane and began legal action. That was brought in the names of three asylum seekers, 24-year-old Wayoka Limbuela, from Angola, Binyam Tefera Tesema, 26, from Ethiopia, and Yusif Adam, 28, from Sudan. All had been on the streets without shelter or money.
The law lords ruled that their human rights had been breached because they had been subjected to "inhuman and degrading treatment".
Lord Bingham said ministers had a duty to prevent foreseeable destitution caused by the policy. He added: "I have no doubt that the threshold [of suffering] may be crossed if a late applicant with no means and no alternative sources of support, unable to support himself is, by deliberate action of the state, denied shelter, food or the most basic necessities of life."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments