Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

PM faces sleaze row over £2m 'slush fund'

Colin Brown,Deputy Political Editor
Friday 24 November 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair is embroiled in a new row about sleaze, after a local authority watchdog said it was investigating allegations that Labour is using council taxpayers' money for a £2m campaign "slush fund".

Labour has ordered its councillors to pay a proportion of their allowances to help the party wipe out its massive debts or else face disciplinary action.

The Standards Board for England is investigating the levy after a complaint by the former Labour leader of Sunderland Council, Bryan Sidaway. The party is said to have breached the board's code of conduct, which requires that councillors' allowances should not be used for political purposes unless it is for the good of council taxpayers.

Eric Pickles, the Conservative spokesman on Local Government, said: "It does seem to me that the Labour Party is getting a £2m slush fund." Labour responded that the money was from "councillors personally and not the council".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in