PM asked to stay for a year
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair's most loyal ministers are urging him to stay in office for a year. They have privately said his early departure would hand the Tories a weapon concerning Labour's lack of "legitimacy" after a change of leader.
The Prime Minister's decision to back his wounded deputy, John Prescott, in the row over his involvement with US billionaire Philip Anschutz and the Greenwich Dome, has fuelled expectations at Westminster that Mr Blair will signal both their departures at the Labour Party conference in September.
There is growing speculation among ministers that an election for the leader and deputy leader will be triggered by the end of the year, with a special spring conference called to announce the results and anoint their successors early in the new year.
But Blairite ministers have joined the so-called "ultras" inside No 10 in pressing him not to quit this year. "There would be immediate problems if Tony did go early," said one minister. "We would be challenged over our legitimacy. The Opposition would mount a campaign for an early general election. Also, once Tony had gone, he would become a hero, which is in the nature of things. And it would appear he had been forced out. There would be a backlash against Gordon Brown. None of this would work to Gordon's advantage."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments