PM accused of hypocrisy after attacking critics of big business
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Business leaders heaped praise on David Cameron last night after he called for an end to "anti-business rhetoric" from politicians.
But the Prime Minister was accused of making a U-turn because only last month he joined Labour and Liberal Democrats in attacking excessive pay and bonuses. It is believed that he came under pressure to tone down the Government's language from senior businessmen, including some Conservative Party donors.
On 8 January, the Prime Minister told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show: "Payments for failure, those big rewards when people fail... make people's blood boil... it's the excessive growth in payment unrelated to success that's frankly ripping off the shareholder and the customer and is crony capitalism."
On 19 January, Mr Cameron endorsed moves to strip Fred Goodwin, the former Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive, of his knighthood and called for the bank's bonuses to be limited.
Yesterday, he took a different tone, telling the Business in the Community charity: "In recent months we've heard some dangerous rhetoric creep into our national debate that wealth creation is somehow anti-social, that people in business are out for themselves. We have got to fight this mood."
Mr Cameron said he was sick of "anti-business snobbery" that suggests business has no inherent moral worth, is not to be trusted, and should stay out of social concerns.
"We see this in the debate on education. Put a young person into college for a month's learning, unpaid – and it's hailed as a good thing. Put a young person into a supermarket for a month's learning, unpaid – and it's slammed as slave labour," he said.
Labour accused Mr Cameron of being "totally confused and inconsistent". Chuka Umunna, the shadow Business Secretary, said: "He has abandoned the pretence that he will tackle irresponsible capitalism. He has chosen the very day when RBS dishes out hundreds of millions to loss-making investment bankers and British Gas announces huge profits to declare a truce with vested interests."
John Cridland, CBI director general, said: "Businesses will be relieved to hear the Prime Minister condemn the anti-business rhetoric that has soured recent public debate. Business is a force for good and wants to be at the vanguard of economic growth and social innovation, but it can only do this with public and political support."
U-turn: Cameron's changing tune
8 January 'Excessive growth in payments unrelated to success [is] ripping off the shareholder... [it's] crony capitalism and [it's] wrong.' (on Andrew Marr Show)
Yesterday 'In recent months we've heard some dangerous rhetoric creep into our national debate that wealth creation is somehow anti-social.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments