Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plan for separate votes by English MPs

 

Andrew Grice
Sunday 24 March 2013 22:06 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Laws that affect only England should normally require the support of a majority of English MPs, a government-ordered inquiry recommends today.

The McKay Commission proposed that Commons decisions with a "separate and distinct effect" for England should "normally be taken only with the consent of a majority of MPs sitting for constituencies in England.” The rule would also apply to decisions that only affected England and Wales, on issues devolved to the Scottish Parliament.

The review was launched last year into the so-called West Lothian Question - the ability of politicians from Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland to vote in the Commons on issues that do not affect their constituents. In 2004, the votes of Scottish and Welsh MPs enabled the then Labour Government to bring in university top-up fees in England.

Sir William McKay, who chaired the commission, said: "The status quo clearly cannot be sustained. Our proposals retain the right of a UK-wide majority to make the final decisions where they believe UK interests or those of a part of the UK other than England should prevail. We expect that governments will prefer compromise to conflict.

"There is a feeling that England is at a disadvantage, and that it's not right that MPs representing the devolved nations should be able to vote on matters affecting England.”

The commission rejected as "flawed and impractical" a law requiring all England-only legislation requiring a majority of English MPs as well as an overall majority. Instead,  it suggested a "double count" , where the proportion of English MPs supporting a Bill would be published alongside the overall result.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in