Phone-tapping warrants rise 62% since 1990
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE MASTER of the Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham, yesterday said anti-terrorist surveillance had led to a 62 per cent increase in the number of warrants issued to the security services and the police for telephone taps over the past three years.
The number of warrants rose from 473 in 1990 to 756 in 1992, after an increase in the quota on the number that can be signed by the Home Secretary each year. But Sir Thomas said the ceiling should be scrapped.
He said: 'It would be a subject of legitimate public concern if a terrorist atrocity, a major crime or a large-scale drug importation were to occur following reluctant cancellation of a warrant, which would have detected it because some other warrant was thought (in retrospect perhaps wrongly) to be more urgent or more important.'
Sir Thomas confirmed that some organisations were still tapped because they represented 'a threat to parliamentary democracy and so to national security'. There were no warrants currently in force against 'individual subversives' and 'only a very few organisations are currently subject to interception on that ground'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments