Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chancellor refuses to rule out resigning over Theresa May's attempt to spend billions on her 'legacy'

Philip Hammond resents pressure to free up money from the £27bn no-deal Brexit 'war chest' - even as prime minister packs her bags

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 18 June 2019 07:22 EDT
Comments
Why is Theresa May still prime minister?

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Philip Hammond has not ruled out resigning as chancellor over Theresa May’s attempt to spend billions of pounds on her “legacy”, in her last days in No 10.

Friends of the chancellor acknowledged his “frustration” at the prime minister’s attempt to throw huge sums at education and other voter-friendly projects, despite resigning.

However, they played down a claim he is poised to quit, because he now believes he is winning the battle with his next-door neighbour.

One source told The Independent they “don’t think” Mr Hammond will resign, noting that Ms May appeared to have “cooled” on opening the purse strings in the last few days.

“Over the last three years, multiple reports of the chancellor's impending resignation have proved to be premature,” a friend said.

John McDonnell leapt on the row as “another example of how far the Tories are cut off from the real world”.

“Instead of resigning because of May’s attempt to spend more on education, Hammond should resign because his austerity policies have resulted in the suffering of hungry children in class,” the shadow chancellor tweeted.

No 10 is understood to have urged Mr Hammond to free up money from the £27bn “war chest” he set aside in case of a no-deal Brexit to fund fresh spending.

Ms May has been stung by criticism that education spending has dropped sharply, forcing some schools – including the one she attended – to close early on Fridays and beg for cash.

The chancellor has been arguing she must not bind the hands of her successor, but is now more confident that Downing Street is stepping back from a clash that would force him out.

“I don’t think he will resign,” the source said. “No 10 appears to have cooled on the public spending pressures in the last few days.”

The source stressed that Mr Hammond was not opposed to more spending on education, but added: “He simply thinks it should be a decision for the next prime minister.”

“We don’t know the Brexit policy that will result from this leadership contest – and, after nine years, the next PM will actually have a choice to make.”

Asked about Mr Hammond’s position, the prime minister’s spokesman said: “It has been quite hard keeping up with the anonymous quotes from friends of the chancellor in recent days.”

Ms May, who will leave power on or soon after 22 July, has already sought to define her legacy with pledges to tackle climate change, mental health and modern slavery.

This week, she set out plans for new teachers to receive training on how to spot the signs of mental health problems in youngsters, under a plan to overhaul society's approach to the issue.

However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has highlighted how a £3.8bn cash injection is needed to reverse 8 per cent of cuts in per pupil school spending, in recent years.

After that, a further £1.1bn would be needed each year up until 2023 to maintain spending in real terms, once rising costs were taken into account, it warned.

The government claims funding for schools is at its highest level ever – but the candidates for No 10 have made competing promises to spend more.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in