Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Peers' move to alter vote on age of consent

Nicholas Timmins
Thursday 26 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A LABOUR frontbench peer yesterday tabled amendments to the Criminal Justice Bill which would lower the age of homosexual consent to 16. The move came as a counter to moves by leading churchmen to reverse the Commons vote earlier this year which lowered it to 18.

The Bishop of Chester, Dr Michael Baughen, and the Duke of Norfolk, Britain's leading Catholic layman, are among peers who are seeking an amendment which would set aside the Commons vote to lower the age from 21.

Yesterday, Lord McIntosh of Haringey, Labour's senior home affairs spokesman in the Lords, tabled counter amendments which would lower the age of consent to 16. In the Commons, Labour allowed MPs a free vote on the issue.

The move by Lord McIntosh came as gay rights campaigners are likely to mount vigorous protests at the attempt to reverse the Commons decision.

No date has yet been set for the amendments to be debated after the Lords returns from its late spring break on 6 June and it is unlikely to be before 14 June.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in