Peers forced to prove how popular they are
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Members of the House of Lords face an unwelcome popularity test because new rules will force them to publicly declare the names and financial interests of their friends.
Many fear the privacy of their social circles is in jeopardy because a new code of conduct, pushed through by the Government this week, requires them to 'out' neighbours, school friends and dining partners.
Some peers, including Lady Park, the Tory peer and former diplomat, say they have too many friends to register but some cross-bench peers are proposing to send in lists of people they cannot count as friends.
Lady Park said: "I was a diplomat for 30 years and have lots of friends from that world. A lot of my graduates still write to me and become close friends. All these areas produce new circles of friends. I have no idea what shares my friends hold. You don't sit down and solemnly say to them 'What are your business interests?"
Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader in the Lords, said the code penalised popular peers. He said: "If you have no friends and no relatives and not many interests you seem to be ideal for the House of Lords."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments