Peers back vaccination policy before slaughter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peers defeated the Government yesterday over its response to foot-and-mouth and other farm diseases, backing an amendment to the Animal Health Bill that gives vaccination priority over slaughter in dealing with epidemics.
Peers voted by 171 to 123 for the amendment, moved by cross-bencher the Countess of Mar, a Worcestershire farmer, during the Bill's report stage, for the Environment Secretary to "give priority to a 'vaccinate to live' policy" prior to slaughtering animals where no infection has been detected.
Ministers are likely to attempt to overturn the defeat next month, saying legislation already allows vaccination to be used instead of slaughter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments