Patten under attack for 'smear' tactics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SPECULATION over Labour's future leader took a farcical turn yesterday when a Cabinet minister used a by-election news conference to impart the view, attributed to a Shadow Cabinet member, that Downing Street might prove too small for Tony Blair's family, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
The controversial episode was immediately denounced by Labour as a Tory smear.
John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, lived up to his growing reputation for shooting from the hip when he reported a hotly denied train conversation with Mo Mowlam, Labour's heritage spokeswoman, at the Tories' press conference for the Eastleigh, Hampshire, by-election.
Mr Patten claimed that Dr Mowlam had indicated that one of the main preoccupations of Tony Blair, the shadow Home Secretary, 'was the fact that when he moves into Number 10 he is going to need extra bedrooms for the children in the flat upstairs because there is not adequate accommodation'.
Mr Blair is the front-runner to succeed the late John Smith.
Mr Patten and Dr Mowlam had been sharing a first-class compartment on the early morning journey from London. Mr Patten told reporters: 'She was able to tell me an awful lot about Tony Blair's campaign.'
Dr Mowlam dismissed Mr Patten's claims. Mr Blair said: 'It's a complete fabrication.'
The affair eclipsed the serious topics selected by the three main parties for discussion yesterday - education for the Tories, pensions for Labour and the economy for the Liberal Democrats. Stephen Reid, (Conserative) is defending a 17,000 majority against David Chidgey (Liberal Democrat) tipped to win the contest, also on 9 June, and Marilyn Birks (Labour).
1992 General Election result: Stephen Milligan (C) 38,998; David Chidgey (LD) 21,296; Jo Sugrue (Lab) 15,768. C maj: 17,702.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments