Fines issued for No 10 party on eve of Prince Philip’s funeral – but minister says world has ‘moved on’
Cabinet minister defends PM and warns against ‘self-indulgent leadership contest’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Metropolitan Police are believed to have issued fines to government staff who attended a party at No 10 on the eve of Prince Philip’s funeral last year.
Fixed-penalty notices (FPN) have been handed to some who attended the 16 April leaving gathering for former communications director James Slack by email, according to the BBC.
It comes as cabinet minister Simon Hart claimed “the world has moved on” from the Partygate scandal – and warned against a “self-indulgent” leadership contest if Boris Johnson receives a fine.
Asked if the idea of a party on the eve of the funeral “sits comfortably” with him, Mr Hart told Sky News: “Of course it doesn’t, why should it? … It doesn’t sit comfortably for anybody.”
However, the Welsh secretary said his constituents would not want the PM to resign if fined. “The idea that it might be appropriate to have a six-week, self-indulgent leadership contest – frankly, I don’t that’s very sensible ... The world has moved on a considerable distance.”
Jacob Rees-Mogg also defended his dismissal of the partygate row as “fluff” in the context of the war in Ukraine and the cost-of-living crisis – saying it was “not the most important issue in the world”.
The government’s former ethics chief Helen MacNamara has also been fined over the “partygate” scandal as part of the initial round of 20 fines, according to reports.
Ms MacNamara, who used to be the deputy cabinet secretary, is said to be among the first group of people to receive a FPN as part of the police investigation into lockdown-breaching parties.
She received a £50 fine on Friday in connection with a leaving do held in the Cabinet Office on 18 June 2020 to mark the departure of a private secretary, according to The Telegraph.
Some officials who joined Mr Slack’s leaving do on 16 April last year were told they will be given fines, The Guardian first reported. Staff reportedly held such a boisterous party that they broke a garden swing used by the prime minister’s son Wilf.
Meanwhile, Mr Johnson will reportedly not be interviewed by the Metropolitan Police as part of their investigation into alleged lockdown-breaching parties.
This is because the force is not interviewing those who have received questionnaires as part of the inquiries, and could potentially be fined, according to ITV News.
The Met is investigating 12 events, including as many as six Mr Johnson is said to have attended, and has sent out more than 100 questionnaires. The PM received his in February.
ITV host Robert Peston said the only officials being interviewed are “witnesses”, whose role is to help the police interpret questionnaires submitted by other people. “The Met are not interviewing those who received questionnaires and are in the frame to be fined,” he said.
Downing Street confirmed that Mr Johnson has not been informed whether he is to be fined over gatherings he attended during the pandemic, while No 10 continued to refuse to accept the law had been broken.
His official spokesman said: “The prime minister wants to comment at the conclusion of the process and not in the middle of it … we will have more to say at the conclusion of the process.”
Mr Rees-Mogg acknowledged during a LBC phone-in that people were “undeniably cross” but insisted that Mr Johnson had not misled parliament, suggesting the PM had been given “wrong information”.
“The prime minister said that he was told the rules were followed, but that turns out not to be correct and we know that fines have now been issued, but the prime minister can only work on the information he is given.”
The minister for Brexit opportunities told LBC that some coronavirus restrictions imposed during lockdown were “inhuman”. He also said lessons to be Covid inquiry were “not in relation to parties” but in the harshness of rules the government had imposed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments