Parliament & Politics: Poor evidence blamed for dropping of prosecutions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BARBARA MILLS QC, the beleaguered Director of Public Prosecutions, last night mounted a strong justification of the numbers of cases discontinued after charge by the Crown Prosecution Service, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
Questioned by an uneasy Commons Home Affairs Select Committee as she published the results of a month-long survey, Mrs Mills laid heavy emphasis on police responsibility for providing evidence.
The analysis of the halting of more than 10,000 cases in November last year shows that 43 per cent were stopped on grounds of insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.
Asked whether she was satisfied with the quality of evidence from the police, she said: 'We wouldn't be discontinuing for unrealistic prospects of conviction if we were satisfied; 43 out of 100 are turned away so we are not satisfied.'
Sir Ivan Lawrence, a barrister and the Tory chairman of the committee, said he was concerned that the numbers of halted cases had doubled in the last five years.
A defensive Mrs Mills commented that it was 'difficult to win'. It was possible that in its early years the CPS was not reviewing cases as thoroughly. Too lax case reviews would risk allegations of potential miscarriages of justice.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments