Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Official figures 'underestimate casualties in Afghanistan'

Andy McSmith
Thursday 21 September 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Casualties among British soldiers serving in Afghanistan are higher than official figures, according to a commanding officer in the field.

The remarks by Major John Swift, who commands a company of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers in southern Afghanistan, were reported in the Fusiliers' newsletter and briefly appeared on the Ministry of Defence website yesterday, before MoD officials removed them.

Major Swift wrote that "the scale of casualties has not been properly reported and shows no sign of reducing". He also commented that, contrary to what has been said publicly by defence ministers, " political not military imperatives are being followed in the campaign".

According to the official figures, 36 British servicemen have died in Afghanistan so far this year, compared with just four from 2001 to 2005. There are also 37 recorded as being admitted to hospital after being wounded in action in the first seven months of the year, plus 10 more in August. Another 40 were treated for "non-battle injuries".

However the MoD website concedes that these figures include only those service or civilian personnel treated in the British field hospital at Camp Bastion, the Canadian hospital at Kandahar, or the French or Greek hospitals in Kabul. The UK also has four primary health care centres in Helmand, generally consisting of a doctor and a few nurses. Major Swift's claims that casualties are not properly reported is likely to refer to wounded men being treated at the care centres and sent back into the line, without being entered on the official statistics.

The "political imperatives" mentioned by Major Swift were that the UK and other Nato governments have responded to a plea by Afghanistan's President, Hamid Karzai, who feared the Taliban, operating from bases across the Pakistan border, were on the verge of taking entire provinces in southern Afghanistan.

Military planners had intended British troops to be stationed in the main towns, such as Kabul, but since May, British troops have been in the countryside in Helmand province, where they are exposed to constant attack by the Taliban.

An MoD spokesman denied it had ordered the removal of Major Swift's comments from the website and stressed the transparency of the department's reporting procedures . "We publish our casualty figures, and they cover all serious injuries. We're not going to go and capture [figures] for everybody who gets a cut."

The leaked comments came only days after the Defence Secretary, Des Browne, admitted that the "tenacity" shown by the Taliban had been a surprise.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in