Northern Irish power-sharing talks 'cancelled at last minute', party claims
Parties have less than two weeks to reach an agreement and stop direct rule being imposed from London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Negotiations to reach a power-sharing deal in Northern Ireland have not taken place after they were cancelled last minute, one of the parties has claimed.
The parties have less than a fortnight left to reach a deal by 27 March, in order to save Stormont and prevent direct rule being imposed from London.
Key players were due to engage in round-table talks, including the local parties as well as representatives of both the British and Irish governments. However, leader of the Social Democratic and Labour Party, Colum Eastwood MLA, says the talks were cancelled at the last minute.
He told the Belfast Telegraph that the collapse of talks was “unfortunate” and called for an independent chairperson to facilitate future talks, adding: “There should have been somebody here to chair all of this”.
Power-sharing collapsed in January after Sinn Féin walked away from the Stormont executive. The party criticised their coalition counterparts, the Democratic Unionist Party, whose leader Arlene Foster is accused of badly mishandling a public scheme which has cost taxpayers £480 million.
Fresh elections were called for 2 March in a bid to elect a new government willing to return to power-sharing. However, Sinn Féin saw a surge of support in the polls and were returned just one seat short of the DUP’s majority. Now stronger than ever, concerns have been raised that Sinn Féin may continue to refuse to return to the executive, seeing the election as a vote of support in their decision to refuse to power-share previously.
In addition, DUP leader and former First Minister Arlene Foster continues to refuse to step aside while an independent inquiry can be carried out into allegations surrounding her involvement in the scheme. Sinn Fein has demanded she step down, accusing her and the party of “arrogance”. However, the DUP has insisted Ms Foster has done nothing wrong and say Sinn Fein are merely trying to capitalise on unionist weakness in order to score points and undermine their cause.
The parties have less than two weeks to reach a decision and announce if they will be nominating a First Minister and Deputy First Minister. Under power-sharing rules, both nationalist and unionist politicians must share power at all times in order to Stormont to stand.
Failure to agree to a return of the institutions would see Northern Ireland ruled directly from London for the first time in a decade.
Ms Foster told the Belfast Telegraph she and her party colleagues are “very mindful” that the pending deadline for resolution is “very tight”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments