No-deal Brexit 'illegal because of imminent risks to life', says human rights lawyer
'From security breaches to lack of medicines ... a no-deal Brexit will be unlawful under the Human Rights Act and the UK’s wider international human rights treaty obligations,' says Jonathan Cooper
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading human rights lawyer has warned a no-deal Brexit would be be illegal because of the “real and immediate risk to life”.
Jonathan Cooper, who was awarded an OBE for his work in 2007, says the government would be knowingly putting the British public in danger if the UK crashes out of the EU without an agreement.
Citing threats ranging from a shortage of medicines to a breakdown in law and order, he argues the result will be unlawful under the Human Rights Act and the international human rights treaty obligations.
“As a matter of human rights law, as well as the common law, the UK Government cannot deliberately expose people to policies that risk a loss of life,” he argues in an article for The Independent.
“The fact that a no-deal Brexit will mean deaths that would not have occurred otherwise, demands that the UK Government cannot contemplate no deal.
“The Government knows that there is a real and immediate risk to life by pursuing no deal. As a matter of the UK’s constitutional framework, no deal is simply off the table. No deal breaks the law.”
Mr Cooper, a member of Doughty Street Chambers, says that litigation to stop a no-deal Brexit will be “inevitable” and cases may end up before the European Court of Human Rights.
“The prospect of British cancer patients standing before the European Court simply pleading to stay alive and to put a no-deal Brexit on hold will be the ultimate indignity for Theresa May’s Brexit strategy,” he adds.
“Worse still for the prime minister is that, in the event of no deal, investigations into the loss of life under these circumstances will be carried out in public and responsibility for deaths will be attributed.”
He also claims that the UK could be held to account at the UN and before the European Court of Human Rights – even if an act of parliament was passed mandating a no-deal Brexit.
“Human rights laws would not prevent Brexit, but they do require a human rights-compliant Brexit,” he writes.
The warning came as the government began testing its contingency plans to ease congestion on roads to Dover in the event of a no-deal Brexit.
Police are preparing for disorder and protests and defence secretary Gavin Williamson has said 3,500 troops will be on standby in the event of a crisis.
Plans to stockpile vital blood products and medicines were announced last year but last month health secretary Matt Hancock said there could be up to six months of drug shortages.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments