No 10 resists calls to allow phone-tap terror evidence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Downing Street appeared to be holding out yesterday against proposals by Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, to allow the use of telephone intercept evidence against terrorists in court.
The intelligence services have opposed the use of their phone tap evidence because they fear it could give away their sources and techniques for surveillance to terrorists and organised crime gangs.
But Lord Goldsmith said he believed their anxieties could now be allayed following meetings with his American counterpart, Alberto Gonzales, and senior US prosecutors, judges and the FBI. Lord Goldsmith acknowledged that there were "differences of view" among the intelligence agencies on the issue, but said he believed concerns about the disclosure of covert techniques could be met by giving prosecutors the option not to use intercept evidence if there was a risk that future operations could be compromised.
"Obviously our agencies use these methods and procedures in order to protect the people of our country, and we must ensure they are not put in a position where that ability is prejudiced," he said.
The Tories, Liberal Democrats and civil rights campaigners signalled that they would give a fair wind to such a change in the law. Dominic Grieve, the shadow Attorney General said it was "a far more effective counter-terrorism measure" than control orders.
Shami Chakrabati, the director of Liberty, said allowing phone tap evidence would enable the authorities to put terrorist suspects on trial rather than holding them under house arrest. "Our reluctance to use phone-tap evidence in terror cases like most other countries is frankly mind-boggling," she said.
However, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said that while the issue was the subject of "ongoing active work" they would not put at risk the security services' sources or personnel.
"What we cannot do is jeopardise the work of our security services through a sensible desire to use intercept evidence," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments