Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK ‘absolutely in favour of nuclear disarmament’ despite Trident expansion, minister says

Experts say move to increase arsenal could be a breach of international law

Matt Mathers
Tuesday 16 March 2021 20:40 EDT
Comments
Keir Starmer questions 'purpose' of increasing number of nuclear warheads

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK is "absolutely in favour of nuclear disarmament", a minister has said after the government announced it would lift a cap on the number of warheads it can stockpile.

Foreign Office minister James Cleverly defended the government's integrated defence review, published on Tuesday, which set out Britain's post-Brexit foreign policy priorities and military plans.

It said the UK would increase limits on its nuclear arsenal by 40 per cent, to 260 warheads, a move campaigners and experts warned could be a violation of international law.

The announcement came despite the UK being a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which commits the government to gradual nuclear disarmament under international law – a policy successive administrations have adhered to.

Appearing on BBC Newsnight on Tuesday, Mr Cleverly insisted the government was committed to the treaty, saying that "of course" it matters.

Read more:

He said: "We should remember that the independent nuclear deterrent is and has been the cornerstone of our national defence – and indeed our collective Nato defence – for decades."

He added: "In a world that is more dangerous and less predictable, it's absolutely right that we maintain a credible independent nuclear deterrent and that's what this is about".

When Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis suggested the government appeared no longer to be in favour of nuclear disarmament, Mr Cleverly said: "We are absolutely in favour of nuclear disarmament.

"But what I've always said is that unilateralism – which has been proposed by CND and others – is not the way to do this."

The UK had previously been committed to cutting its stockpile to 180 warheads by the mid-2020s, but the review said this policy would be changed “in recognition of the evolving security environment, including the developing range of technological and doctrinal threats”.

And while the new plan states that the UK will not fire, or threaten to use, its missiles at a non-nuclear state, it also says that assurance could be reviewed in future in order to maintain the deterrent effect against potential adversaries.

The UK's policy is to only consider using its nuclear weapons "in extreme circumstances of self-defence, including the defence of our Nato allies", according to the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy.

Labour criticised the plans to increase the size of the stockpile, though the party supports the renewal of Trident in general.

“I voted for the renewal of Trident and the Labour Party’s support for nuclear deterrence is non-negotiable – but this review breaks the goal of successive prime ministers and cross-party efforts to reduce our nuclear stockpile,” Sir Keir Starmer said in the Commons earlier on Tuesday. “It doesn’t explain when, why, or for what strategic purpose.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in