Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nato’s signatory countries have “a problem” with not spending enough of their budgets on defence, the alliance’s secretary general has said.
Jens Stoltenberg said member countries had to “stop the cuts” and continue to raise spending on their militaries.
Nato has said its member countries should spend at least two per cent of their GDP on defence; both Labour and the Conservatives support this policy.
Abroad, however, most countries spend far less. Of the 28 countries signed up to the defensive pact, only the United States, Greece, Poland, Estonia and Britain are meeting the commitment.
France and Turkey are the only other Nato countries with spending levels above 1.5 per cent of GDP, with the others nowhere near meeting the minimum commitment.
“We have a problem and that’s why we decided that we have to do something with the problem,” Mr Stoltenberg told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“In 2014 we made a decision to stop the cuts and invest …We see that the trend has shifted – 2015 was the first year with an increase in defence spending among Nato allies and 2016 we expect even more increase.
“It is extremely important that there is no doubt that Nato is there to protect all allies against any threat and that Nato’s security guarantees are unconditioned, they are absolute.
"This is the best way to prevent a conflict and the best way to prevent anyone from attacking Nato allies.”
US presidential candidate Donald Trump said earlier this year that he would consider not defending Nato allies that did not spend up to the target.
Mr Stoltenberg struck a cautious tone on the alliance’s relationship with Russia.
“We don’t see an imminent threat against any Nato ally, but we see a more assertive Russia,” he said.
“We are not in a Cold War but we are not in partnership with Russia we were in after the Cold War.”
He defended a planned build-up of Nato troops along Russian borders, arguing that the move would “send a very clear signal” of deterrence and that Russia itself had “tripled its defence spending in recent years.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments