MPs want English Nature to get tough
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.English Nature, the Government's nature conservation body, has come under attack from MPs who suggest it could do a better job of looking after wildlife sites.
The influential Public Accounts Committee said yesterday that it had concerns about the way in which English Nature was protecting and managing the 3,800 Government-designated Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in England.
These areas, which range in size from less than one acre to thousands of acres, have been chosen because they have unusual, rare or rich collections of plants and animals or interesting rocks. Most are in the hands of private landowners, many of whom are paid in return for managing them in a way which conserves the wildlife interest. English Nature has powers to prosecute landowners who knowingly damage SSSIs or to obtain Government Nature Conservation Orders which outlaw damaging activities at a named site. ''Over the last seven years there have been 1,005 cases of loss and damage but only nine prosecutions (and) 18 Orders are in place,'' the report says.
''Given the extent of damage to sites, we believe that English Nature should not be reluctant to prosecute or apply for Nature Conservation Orders where appropriate,'' the MPs state.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments