MPs seek priority for fire safety
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PUBLICITY about fire prevention does not come high enough on the Government's list of priorities and more could be done to reduce the number of fires, which account for more than 700 deaths and 12,000 injuries a year, writes Chris Blackhurst.
The Commons Public Accounts Committee yesterday accused the Home Office of giving fire safety 'a public profile well below that of crime prevention'.
Fire prevention is supposed to reduce the number of fire deaths and injuries, yet over the past 30 years they have risen steeply. In 1960, there were 120,000 fires, causing 430 deaths and 3,100 injuries. In 1990, there were 401,000 fires, resulting in 740 deaths and 11,800 injuries. The UK death rate is higher than other developed countries and fire insurance claims total more than pounds 1bn a year.
The Home Office spent only pounds 2m on fire prevention publicity in 1992, compared with pounds 5.9m on crime. National Fire Safety Week in 1991 had a budget of pounds 55,000 as against pounds 4.5m for Crime Prevention Week.
MPs said many old people, and others in vulnerable groups, were still without smoke alarms. As a matter of urgency, the Home Office should begin developing and issuing educational material about fire safety to schools.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments