MPs' salaries may rise by £24,000
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPs will vote this summer on whether all or part of their £24,000-a-year "second homes" allowance should be added to their £61,820 annual salary.
In return for the one-off boost to their salaries, MPs may agree to their expenses being audited by outsiders for the first time in an attempt to reassure the public they are not abusing the system.
MPs have launched a root and branch review of their expenses following the scandal in which the Tory MP Derek Conway paid his two sons as researchers while they were at university. The initial thoughts of the Members Estimates Committee, chaired by the Speaker Michael Martin, emerged in a progress report yesterday.
Many MPs – and Labour ministers – believe that adding the additional costs allowance (ACA) to salaries would provoke a public backlash, with MPs being accused of awarding themselves a 30 per cent plus pay rise. But others are arguing that it would be better to take a "one-off hit" over an unpopular wage hike to limit future controversies over the ACA.
The other main option to be presented to the Commons in July will be to keep the "second homes" allowance but add safeguards against abuse. The £400-a-month MPs can claim for food is likely to be cut. They could also be paid a daily allowance for living away from home of at least £125 instead of claiming help towards their mortgage, rent, furnishings and food – coupled with an annual "health check" in which officials would check their bills.
But committee members revealed they would reject the idea of buying a block of flats near Westminster for MPs to stay in while the House is sitting – nicknamed the "Colditz" option.
*Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, has ruled that details of MPs' spending on constituency newsletters should be released in a test case involving Welsh MPs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments