MPs not told of Dome directors' guarantee
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government faced renewed criticism over the Millennium Dome yesterday as a report said it was "unacceptable" that MPs were not told that the Dome's directors were given a guarantee against personal losses at the height of the affair.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said Parliament should have been informed that directors of the New Millennium Experience Company (NMEC) were given government indemnity against losses as the Dome's finances deteriorated. A report said the decision opened up the possibility that taxpayers' money might have been needed to bail out the Lottery-funded attraction.
Edward Leigh, chairman of PAC, said: "This lack of transparency is wholly unacceptable and must not be repeated." The committee's report, published today, catalogued a series of failings in the planning, operation and finances of the Dome. It warned that the organisation was "elaborate and complex and gave rise to confusion and disagreement among the parties involved as to exactly who was responsible for what".
NMEC directors asked to be given indemnity from losses in May 2000 amid fears of legal action from the Dome's creditors. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport gave the guarantee, but did not report it to Parliament, believing the Dome was covered by a blanket indemnity against loss given to directors of Government quangos.
But the report said: "In our view, the indemnity was outside the normal course of business and exposed the public purse to expenditure of such a nature and size that Parliament should have been notified."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments