Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MPs face tougher rules as Commons expels Conway

(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MPs are likely to be able to carry on employing members of their families at the taxpayers' expense in spite of the scandal over the disgraced Tory MP Derek Conway, who was expelled from the Commons for 10 days yesterday.

House of Commons rules are expected to be tightened to require MPs to declare payments on a public register if they employ spouses or children on their expenses, which many do. Spot checks could also be introduced, after Downing Street said the idea was "interesting".

However, sources for Gordon Brown and David Cameron, the Tory leader, made it clear they would not support a move to ban MPs from employing members of their families.

Mr Conway, who announced he was quitting Parliament at the next election, was suspended yesterday for "misusing" parliamentary funds by employing his sons, Henry and Freddie, for £32,000 and £45,163 as research assistants without any evidence that they did any work.

It also emerged he had paid an intimate friend of Henry Conway, Michel Pratte, as a researcher but had only paid his full-time secretary £15,300 a year for working in his constituency office in Old Bexley and Sidcup.

Mr Conway was accused by the former Labour minister Frank Field of "embezzlement" but the police are unlikely to mount a criminal investigation.

But Scotland Yard confirmed that it has received a letter asking for an inquiry into whether fraud had been committed from Duncan Borrowman, the Liberal Democrat candidate for Mr Conway's seat.

Walking out of his mansion flat in central London, Mr Conway tried to play down the affair, emphasising that Mr Pratte was not a relative and saying of his sons : "Young people will be young people ... They have a right to a social life."

Last night the former Tory chancellor Kenneth Clarke said of Mr Conway: "In any other walk of life he would be sacked."

Speaking on BBC1's Question Time, Mr Clarke added that "public feeling is very, very strong and should not be underestimated". Referring to allegations of "sleaze" across both main political parties, Mr Clarke called for state funding for political parties.

Sir George Young, the Conservative chairman of the standards committee, told the Commons that the allegations around MPs' expenses were damaging the reputation of Parliament.

"This is money our constituents have paid for through their taxes. It is important MPs can demonstrate robustly if challenged, that their use of allowances is above reproach," Sir George said.

The Speaker of the House, Michael Martin, is refusing to publish the full details of MPs who employ their relatives.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in