Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Conversations between a Labour MP and a constituent of his in prison were bugged, the Government confirmed today.
But Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said an inquiry had concluded that the correct procedures had been followed.
She said the inquiry by surveillance commissioner, Sir Christopher Rose, had found the MP for Tooting, Sadiq Khan, was not the "target" for the bugging.
Ms Smith agreed with Sir Christopher that there was "scope for confusion" on the present surveillance and interception rules.
In a Commons statement, she announced a review of the codes of practice to clarify that conversations between MPs and constituents should be considered "confidential".
The bugging row centred on two conversations between Mr Khan and Babar Ahmad at Woodhill prison in 2005 and 2006.
Ms Smith said Sir Christopher had concluded that the Wilson doctrine governing the interception of communications involving MPs did not apply in this case, which involved surveillance.
Mr Khan first visited Ahmad before becoming an MP and was still listed as a "friend" on subsequent visits after being elected.
"These two visits which occurred after he had become an MP were monitored by surveillance.
"It is absolutely clear from Sir Christopher's report that Mr Khan was not the target of this surveillance."
Sir Christopher had found that warrants for surveillance of visits to Ahmad were correctly authorised and the correct procedures followed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments