Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MoD paid Priory clinics £9m to treat soldiers

Colin Brown,Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 25 May 2006 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The growing toll of mental health problems within the armed forces has led to a bill of more than £9m from the Priory Group for the Ministry of Defence.

The clinics are world famous for treating film stars and music celebrities for addiction but they are also privately treating hundreds of servicemen and women for mental health problems.

Figures revealed yesterday in written answers to the Commons showed that the MoD paid £4.1m in 2004-5 for the treatment of 321 servicemen and women and a further £4.4m for 351 troops in 2005-6.

The figures highlight the toll the Iraq war, service in Afghanistan and security operations across the world are exacting on the armed forces. It follows reports that members of the Territorial Army, reservists, who have served in Iraq are suffering more mental health problems than their professional comrades-in-arms.

Reservists were found to be at 25 times greater risk of having common mental health symptoms and service-related fatigue and 50 per cent more likely to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.

The Priory Group became embroiled in controversy when the head of the company, Dr Chai Patel, was blocked for a peerage by the Lords Appointments Commission after being nominated by Tony Blair. Dr Patel was among Labour Party supporters who had given secret loans to the party in the run-up to the general election. The Metropolitan Police are investigating criminal allegations against Mr Blair over the "cash-for-peerages" row, following a complain by Angus MacNeil, a Scottish Nationalist MP.

MPs suspended a parliamentary inquiry into the peerages dispute last week after the Met's chief investigator on the case, John Yates, warned it could undermine their criminal investigation. Mr Yates has been told to produce results by July or the MPs will resume interviews with key witnesses, including Lord Levy, Labour's chief fund-raiser.

Mr MacNeil tabled the question to the MoD asking how much it had paid the Priory Group for psychiatric services since it won the contract in 2003. Tom Watson, a Defence minister, said at the time the contract was awarded, NHS hospitals did not bid for it. It was previously carried out by the Duchess of Kent Pyschiatric Hospital, which cost the MoD £10m in 2002-3.

A spokesman for the MoD said: "We have these contracts with the Priory Group and do not use the NHS because we need to give a guarantee that there will be a bed when they are needed."

He said the private clinics ensured that soldiers could be treated near to their homes, although they were all in-patient cases. Mr Watson said community-based mental care was available to every military unit through centres in the UK and satellite units in Germany and Cyprus.

In a separate reply to Mr MacNeil, Mr Watson said the MoD contract for an in-patient psychiatric healthcare service was subject to competitive tender.

"The Priory Group's tender best met our requirements for high quality in-patient care, without delay and on a regional basis, and they were awarded the contract... Whilst NHS providers did have the opportunity to bid, there were no expressions of interest from the NHS."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in