Minister 'dodging blame for pensions blunder'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers were accused yesterday of passing the buck for a statistical blunder that could slice billions from official estimates of the amount people are saving for retirement.
The Conservatives accused Andrew Smith, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, of "blaming everybody but himself" after serious flaws in the way contributions are calculated were exposed.
Downing Street denied a rift between the Department for Work and Pensions and the Office for National Statistics, insisting the ONS had apologised for the error. The ONS said it was sorry the statistics "had become the story".
Yesterday David Willetts, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, increased pressure on the Government, accusing ministers of imposing £6.5bn in stealth taxes on pension funds and making a "complete mess" of pensions policy.
Opening an Opposition Day debate on pensions, he told MPs: "We face a Labour environment for pension provision and what it means is less saving, lower-funded pensions and a poorer retirement for millions of British people.
"The effect of the tax increases and reduction in value of contracted-out rebates is to drive pensioners, now and in the future, on to means-tested benefits, and more dependency on welfare."
But Mr Smith accused the Conservatives of secretly planning to abolish the basic state pension, quoting a letter from Mr Willetts saying: "The vision of moving to a funded alternative to the basic state pension is a powerful and compelling one." Mr Smith told MPs: "That means their vision is to privatise the basic state pension.
"The dividing lines are clear. We believe in a partnership, in a balance between state and private funding. They believe in privatising the basic state pension." Mr Smith welcomed the decision of the independent Accounting Standards Board to delay the introduction of the controversial FRS 17 rules blamed for the closure of some final salary pension schemes.
The FRS 17 rules, planned to come into effect in December, had required firms to include a snapshot of huge pension liabilities in their accounts. But Mr Smith said new international rules in 2005 would allow accounts to reflect the long-term nature of pension funds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments