Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Minister defends British train tickets being more expensive than ones on the continent

Claire Perry suggests the Government believes in a lower state subsidy

Jon Stone
Tuesday 18 August 2015 04:51 EDT
Comments
(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rail fares are more expensive in Britain than on the continent because ministers believe that train travel should not be as heavily supported by the state, the rail minister has said.

The statement comes after an analysis showing that rail fares have risen three times faster than wages over the last five years.

Asked why Britain’s passengers were charged so much for on-the-day fares compare to people in other countries, Claire Perry said passengers should be made to pay for improvements and rail projects.

“On the continent most governments choose to tax the general population to subsidise the cost of rail fares,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“We do that too – but I think it’s right particularly at a time with unprecedented investment … that part of that cost is borne by those who are travelling.”

The rail minister Claire Perry

The Independent

reported last month that expensive Government policies like a cut in fuel duty have led to driving a car getting cheaper and cheaper.

Meanwhile, subsidies for busses and trains have been steeply slashed as public transport costs rise.

The news comes as the candidates to be the next leaders of the Labour party debate whether Britain’s railways should be returned into public hands from private companies – a move that some argue could help reduce costs and plan a better service.

Frontrunner Jeremy Corbyn says he would restore public ownership, but with more structures to give passengers and employees a co-operative say in running services.

Andy Burnham, who polls have shown in second place, says he would allow a state operator to bid for rail franchises and create a national livery to prevent fragmentation on the network.

Liz Kendall has rejected public ownership as old-fashioned, while Yvette Cooper’s has not made train travel one of her key campaign issues.

The public overwhelming support nationalising the railways, with 58 per cent tellling YouGov they would support public ownership compared to only 17 per cent who rejected it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in