Minister criticised for avoiding Commons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Des Browne, the Secretary of State for Defence, has been criticised by MPs for staying in his Scottish constituency instead of making a statement to Commons over the worsening crisis in Afghanistan, which claimed the lives of two more British soldiers at the weekend.
Tom Watson, a junior defence minister, had to face MPs instead. Mr Browne told colleagues that he could not get down to the Commons in time to answer an emergency question tabled by the Tories and allowed by the Speaker, Michael Martin. He was carrying out a constituency surgery.
The Government was left facing a charge of complacency over the worsening situation in Afghanistan. Officials from the Ministry of Defence confirmed that plans were being drawn up to send hundreds more combat troops to Afghanistan. One Tory frontbencher said: "It's appalling that the Secretary of State was not here to answer questions. We were careful to avoid making statements every time a soldier was killed, but not to be here on a Monday is a big mistake."
The MoD denied reports that commanders had called for armoured vehicles, Apache attack helicopters and Harrier GR7 jets to provide close air support. The MoD said there were no plans to increase the total force of 3,300 soldiers on the ground. After graphic reports at the weekend of a shoot-out in which Taliban forces had a British unit pinned down for two hours without air support, MPs from all sides questioned whether Britain had deployed sufficient forces to meet the threat of the resurgent Taliban. There was criticism of John Reid, the former defence secretary, for suggesting they hoped to get through the war without a shot being fired in anger.
Liam Fox, the shadow Defence Secretary, said such remarks showed that the Government had been "naive". But MoD officials defended Mr Reid, saying he had been referring to the changing role of the British mission after the "search and destroy" mission by the US troops.
An MoD source said the deaths of the British forces were regretted, but the Taliban were suffering "massive" losses.
Such remarks are likely to be treated sceptically by critics of the Government's handling of the Afghanistan operation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments