Migration to the UK must be capped, says ex-immigration minister Robert Jenrick
The former immigration minister who resigned over the Rwanda bill claimed legal migration was ‘a bigger scandal’ than illegal migration
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick has called for a cap on net immigration, claiming a “far more restrictive system” is needed.
Mr Jenrick says the government’s recently-passed Rwanda bill will soon “join the graveyard of policies” that failed to tackle illegal migration with refugees, telling The Independent that it would not deter them from crossing the England Channel in small boats.
He called legal migration “a bigger scandal”, urging colleagues to introduce a cap to “tens of thousands”.
Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Jenrick said: “As offensive and dangerous as illegal migration is, the bigger scandal is the story of legal migration because the numbers involved are so much greater.
“Last year, there were about 30,000 illegal small boat arrivals, but this was dwarfed by the 1.2 million people who arrived here perfectly legally.”
According to Mr Jenrick, net migration needs to be restricted to “the tens of thousands”.
“We need to create a far more restrictive system that establishes the UK as the grammar school of the Western world, focusing on attracting the high-skill, high-wage migrants who will be net contributors to the economy,” he said.
“The only way politicians can look voters in the eye and guarantee they can meet their promises to reduce net migration is to introduce a cap which would serve as a democratic lock on numbers.”
He added the cap “should be voted on by all MPs in parliament in a migration budget debate, alongside forecasted impacts of immigration on housing, infrastructure and public services”.
Mr Jenrick resigned as immigration minister in December in protest at prime minister Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda deportation plan, arguing it would not act as a strong enough deterrent to stop asylum seekers arriving via small boats.
Home Office minister Chris Philp declined to set a limit on net immigration when asked for his response to Mr Jenrick’s demand.
Mr Philp told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme: “I’m not in a position to sit here and advocate for a hard cap today. But what I can say is that we’re taking measures that have been enacted and are now being implemented to reduce legal migration by about 300,000 a year. That’s by significantly increasing salary thresholds. It’s by reducing the numbers of dependents who can come in with migrants.
“I think the British public do want us to control, to significantly reduce migration, both legal migration as well as stop illegal migration.”
Mr Philp also said the government is “committed to substantially reducing legal migration”.
He added: “We don’t think it’s right to have large-scale, low-skilled migration. We want a much smaller number of high-skilled migrants.”