Midwives vote to abandon no-strike rule
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An overwhelming majority of midwives has backed the move to abandon the 115-year-old "no strike" rule with more than half indicating that they are in favour of a "partial withdrawal of labour".
Details of the vote came as it emerged that the man responsible for deciding the nurses' 1 per cent pay rise will earn £57,000 a year for a new, three-day-week job.
Mike Bett, chairman of the Nurses and Midwives Pay Review Body, has been appointed as head of a watchdog looking at changes in the Civil Service. His appointment has prompted claims of "jobs for the boys" and increased the sense of outrage felt by nurses and midwives over their treatment.
The Royal College of Midwives will now go to the next stage in their battle with the Government over pay and will ballot members formally on taking industrial action.
Julia Allison, general secretary of the royal college, said yesterday: "Never in its history has the college been so close to industrial action."
Disclosing that 82 per cent of members had voted in favour of changing the constitution to allow for strikes, she said: "I make this announcement with a heavy heart, as I know that many of the RCM members voted with the same feeling.
"We find ourselves on a path which is not of our choosing, and firmly put the blame on the Government's shoulders."
The ballot is the second on industrial action in 10 days. In the first, midwives indicated what they would be prepared to do: 20 per cent would strike but more favoured less extreme actions. In the vote, 78 per cent said they would work to grade, 75 per cent wanted an overtime ban; 72 per cent a withdrawal of goodwill; 70 per cent would refuse to do administrative duties; 67 per cent favoured working to rule and 53 per cent opted partial withdrawal of labour.
However, Virginia Bottomley, the Secretary of State for Health, urged midwives to think again. "I hope they will think long and hard about it. There is no place in the NHS for industrial action," she said.
"In the last six years nurses and midwives have seen their salaries increase by 78 per cent compared to 52 per cent general increase in remuneration I. . . The Government wants nurses and midwives to negotiate pay packages with their local trusts of up to 3 per cent."
Midwives want to see a pay increase of 3 per cent across the country, funded centrally instead of the Government proposal of 1 per cent with an additional 0.5 to 2 per cent to be negotiated locally.
They argue that their anger is over more than pay. More than 200 midwives had been downgraded and suffered pay cuts of up to £3,000 a year.
Ms Allison said that 16,000 midwives voted in the first ballot - a turnout of 53 per cent. She was sure members would vote for industrial action in their fight for "justice".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments