Met Police facing legal challenge for not investigating Boris Johnson parties
Former chief constable says refusal to investigate is becoming ‘issue of competence in the police’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Metropolitan Police is facing a legal challenge over its decision not to launch an investigation into numerous lockdown breaking parties at Downing Street.
The move comes as a former chief constable, Sir Peter Fahy, said the force's approach was becoming “an issue of competence in the police”.
Lawyers acting for the Good Law Project issued formal legal proceedings against the Met on Tuesday, alleging that the failure to investigate was unlawful. The service's decision will now be subject to judicial review.
Government officials and the prime minister are alleged to have repeatedly broken Covid restrictions at No.10, hosting parties and cheese and wine evenings throughout lockdown.
The gathering include social events to celebrate Christmas, as well as a “bring your own booze” drinks on 20 May which the prime minister and his wife reportedly attended.
The Met has however resisted opening a formal investigation into the events despite many other people hosting parties around the same dates receiving hefty fines.
Questions have also been raised about why police officers guarding Downing Street did not spot and report an apparent crime in progress at the time.
It was reported overnight that the Met is in contact with the Cabinet Office over the 20 May event.
Sir Peter, who previously headed Greater Manchester Police, told Times Radio on Tuesday that "questions have been asked why the police are not investigating".
"Normally, if an organisation is thought to have breached the law, you don’t normally leave it for that organisation to go away and investigate it themselves and wait for the result," he said.
"And I think obviously, some people have said there’s quite a lot of police officers on duty, around Number 10, why did they not realise that there was something going on and report it or at least give advice that this shouldn’t be going on?
"So I think, unfortunately, it’s becoming, you know, as well as an issue of political confidence, one of competence in the police and almost the investigation system."
Sir Peter said he understood the force's initial decision not to investigate but that it needed "to give a very full statement about their decision making, probably in consultation with a Crown Prosecution Service, and with the Mayor of London so that "the public do understand the reasoning as to why they’re going to investigate or not investigate".
Jo Maugham, director of Good Law Project, said: "You can have the rule of law, or you can defer to the powerful. But you can't have both. Cressida Dick's cat will know that multiple criminal offences were committed.
"It shames the Met, and ultimately all of us, that she refuses to investigate."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments