Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Men 'risk rape case without consent'

Nigel Morris,Home Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 07 March 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Men are to be warned in a nationwide publicity drive that they could face rape charges if they fail to get a woman's consent for sex.

Ministers have also signalled that the law could be tightened to protect women who are raped when they are drunk.

The £400,000 campaign will include radio advertisements, posters and advertisements in magazines aimed at young men.

It will warn them that the Sexual Offences Act stipulates that a person must agree to sex by choice and have the freedom to make that decision.

A Home Office spokesman said: "Giving consent is active, not passive, and it's up to everyone to make sure that their partner agrees to sexual activity."

Mike O'Brien, the Solicitor General, disclosed that the Government was considering a change in the rape laws to require juries, rather than judges, to decide whether a woman was too drunk to give consent to sex.

The move follows the recent acquittal by a judge of a defendant whose alleged victim said she could not remember what had happened after heavy drinking.

Mr O'Brien said: "It may be that the legislation needs some clarification, because these sorts of mistakes shouldn't be being made."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in