Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Matt Hancock admits only 6 voter fraud cases at last election, as protests grow over ‘photo ID’ crackdown

Queen’s Speech will include Bill requiring ID at polling stations – despite warnings that poorer and ethnic minority voters will be turned away

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 11 May 2021 04:45 EDT
Comments
Only 6 voter fraud cases at last election Hancock admits ahead of ‘photo ID’ crackdown

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Matt Hancock has admitted there were only 6 cases of ballot fraud at the last election, as new rules demanding photo ID spark fears of US-style “voter suppression”. 

The Queen’s Speech will include a Bill to introduce the requirement at polling stations – despite warnings that large numbers of poorer and ethnic minority voters will be turned away.

Quizzed on that criticism – and on the tiny number of fraud cases at the last election – Mr Hancock replied: “Well, I think that’s six cases too many.”

On Sky News, the health secretary was warned that 47 per cent of black people do not have a driver’s licence, compared with only 26 per cent of white people.

“There is a real danger, isn’t there, that you could ultimately prevent key constituents in society from having their say?” he was asked.

But Mr Hancock said: “No know it’s about fairness, it’s about making sure that when people do something as important as voting, then they are who they say they are.

“We piloted this, we’ve looked at it in great detail, we are committed to making it happen – and I think people across this country want to know for sure that elections are fair.”

The civil rights group Liberty has condemned the shake-up, expected to kick-in before the next general election in either 2023 or 2024.

“Our current voting system is safe and secure,” said head of policy Sam Grant. “It feels like an opportunistic attack on the rights of some of the most marginalised people in society.”

Trials in 2019 suggested many tens of thousands of people could be turned away from polling stations because they don’t have the ID required.

The Electoral Commission warned young people, people from ethnic minorities, women and the elderly were most likely to be penalised.

Mr Hancock also faced criticism as he confirmed the social care plan – promised by Boris Johnson on his first day in office, in 2019 – would not be part of the Queen’s Speech.

He blamed the pandemic for preventing the government from giving it “as much focus” as hoped, adding: “I think people will understand that.”

Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, said a failure to announce a cap on catastrophic care costs would be “an incredible worry for people”.

“I’m hoping to hear that we will introduce a cap on people’s care costs, because around one in 10 of us will have catastrophically high care costs,” he said.

“It’s an incredible worry for people. It’s a lottery. You don’t know - that could be you. I think in a civilised society we should find a way of taking away that worry.”

Mr Hunt also said problems in the NHS will not be fixed without a solution to the social care crisis, adding: “So, it really doesn’t make any sense to fund one sector properly and then to ignore the other.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in