Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Matt Hancock says ‘massive thank you’ to UK vaccine taskforce head – despite ‘£670,000 bill for PR consultants’

Health secretary adds he ‘didn’t know’ about public relations contract

Ashley Cowburn
Political Correspondent
Tuesday 10 November 2020 07:38 EST
Comments
Matt Hancock says massive thank you to UK vaccine taskforce head despite bill for PR consultants

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Matt Hancock has insisted the country should say a “massive thank you” to the head of the UK’s vaccine taskforce – despite reports Kate Bingham hired eight public relations consultants at a cost to the taxpayer of £670,000.

Defending Ms Bingham, who is expected to leave her role at the end of 2020, the health secretary said the “service she has given this country” means it is one of the best placed around the world for access to vaccines.

The cabinet minister’s comments come after The Sunday Times reported the vaccine tzar “insisted” on hiring PR consultants to oversee her media strategy since June – costing hundreds of thousands in public money.

On Monday, No 10 insisted Boris Johnson had full confidence in Ms Bingham, a venture capitalist whois married to Conservative minister Jesse Norman, but Sir Keir Starmer said the taxpayer bill for consultants “can’t be justified”.

The prime minister’s official spokesperson told reporters the decision to hire PR advisers was signed off by officials at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) – despite the Whitehall department having existing communications staff.

“Specialist communications support was contracted by the vaccine Taskforce for a time-limited period in line with existing public sector recruitment practices and frameworks,” they added.

Asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme whether he was “comfortable” with public money being used to hire eight full-time consultants, Mr Hancock said: “Well that was signed off by an official in the business department.

“Of course. What I’d say the vaccine taskforce has procured for this country, for the whole UK, 340 million doses of six different leading vaccines, including spotting this one, the Pfizer one, which has become the frontrunner, alongside the AstraZeneca one. We’ve needed throughout this pandemic enormous talent from outside.”

Quizzed again on whether Ms Bingham needed a separate media strategy, he replied: “Obviously I didn’t know about that contract.

“Frankly, what matters is the substance of what the vaccine taskforce has done and I would go out of my way to thank Kate Bingham for the service she has given this country and the whole of the vaccines Taskforce because it means we are one of the best placed countries around the world for access to vaccines. “

The health secretary added: “I’m comfortable with the fact we’ve secured this unbelievable array of vaccines and we are delivering it as fast as we possibly can.

“Let’s look at the substance of what a group of people have achieved and when they’ve given up six months of their life to come into government, and do something, bringing enormous commercial capability, which the government needs and for years people have said the government needs more commercial capability, we should say a massive thank you to the people who are prepared to step up in this national effort.”

In a separate interview with Times Radio, Mr Hancock also insisted no-one had asked Ms Bingham to stand down from her duties because of the reports, insisting: “It was always a six month job and she was always clear that she couldn’t do it for longer than that.”

“He talks about this spending, what I would say to him is that the senior responsible officer in line with his delegated authority approved this resourcing in accordance with public sector practices and frameworks."

At the time of her appointment, the government claimed Ms Bingham was "uniquely qualified for the role having worked in the biotech sector in the UK and internationally for 26 years".

Last week she told MPs that it was likely that nationwide deployment of a vaccine could begin in December and that she was more than 50 per cent confident that all vulnerable people will have been vaccinated against coronavirus by Easter or early summer.

Darren Jones, a Labour MP who chairs Westminster’s Business Select Committee, also raised the issue over taxpayers’ money being used on PR consultants in the Commons on Tuesday, as he called for Ms Bingham to be sacked from her role.

“If she's not sacked, who will be held to account for this gross conflict of interest and misuse of public funds? Will it be (Mr Sharma) or the prime minister?"

However, Alok Sharma, the business secretary, reiterated Mr Hancock’s previous praise of the head of the UK’s vaccine taskforce, adding: “I would just point out that the vaccines taskforce, which does of course sit in my department and is led by Kate Bingham, has done an absolutely brilliant job over the last few months. We have managed to secure 350 million doses across six of the most promising vaccine candidates.

“He talks about this spending, what I would say to him is that the senior responsible officer in line with his delegated authority approved this resourcing in accordance with public sector practices and frameworks."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in