Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Security camera in Hancock’s office which caught his affair was ‘outlier’ and not general policy, government says

Camera inside the Department of Health was an ‘outlier’, minister says

Kate Devlin
Whitehall Editor
Monday 28 June 2021 15:05 EDT
Comments
Angela Rayner demands investigation into Hancock’s use of private email

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The security camera in Matt Hancock’s office which videotaped the health secretary kissing his aide was an ‘outlier’ and not general policy, a ministers has said.

Cabinet office minister Julia Lopez said that as a rule “there are not cameras sited within ministers’ offices”.

In that regard the camera inside the Department of Health was an “outlier”, she said.

She attempted to calm an angry House of Commons by saying that ministers would have a “better understanding of why that occurred” once the Department of Health’s official investigation was complete.

But she faced anger from MPs, including former health ministers, who warned that national security could have been put at risk.

Mr Hancock dramatically resigned over the weekend after his affair was made public.

But his decision to step down has left lingering questions, including over how the videotape emerged in the first place.

Conservative MP Peter Bone was among those who warned that the revelation that the health secretary’s office contained recording devices “should be of national concern. If government and parliamentary offices have recording devices in them - whether audio, visual or both - it is of the utmost concern.”

As a result of the leak a series of security reviews have been launched across Westminster.

Whitehall security specialists are assisting the Department of Health with their investigation.

Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle also told MPs he had ordered a review of parliament’s security arrangements.

Earlier Sajid Javid, Mr Hancock’s replacement told reporters the camera had been disabled.

"I don’t think, as a general rule, there should be cameras in the Secretary of State’s office,” he said.

"I’ve never known that in the other five departments that I’ve run and I’m not really sure why there was one here, but I’m sure there will be more to this as the whole incident is investigated."

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland told Times Radio he did not see why there was any need for a camera in a minister’s office.

He said: "I’ve asked the question, and there no cameras in my office, and I wouldn’t have expected there to be, because the issue really for ministers and indeed all staff is safety and security. And once you’re through the cordon and the security area, then you can reasonably assume that the building is safe and that authorised people only are there. So I don’t see the need for security cameras in government, in that part of the government building."

Ms Lopez also told MPs the government respected the Wilson doctrine – which dates back to Harold Wilson’s administration and bans the surveillance of MPs – and suggested there were no reasons to believe it had been breached.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in